Report on noise abatement systems

Richard Barham • 16 September 2019

July 2019 saw the release of a comprehensive report on noise abatement systems and mitigation measures by SMRU Consulting on behalf of Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH). The results presented in this study are a great resource for how different technical mitigation measures (as opposed to procedural or timing) can be used to reduce noise levels during construction of offshore wind farms, which can be considered when modelling potential noise from wind farm construction.

The report contains details for a range of mitigation measures including bubble curtains, pile casings, resonators and alternative hammers, and presents the efficacy of each type, including an approximate noise reduction in decibels (dB), what frequencies the methods work best over, and suitability to different sites. The noise reductions from the different equipment are variable, but it is noted that with big bubble curtains (BBC), noise mitigation systems (NMS), and hydro sound dampers (HSD), overall noise levels can be reduced by at least 10 dB, with reductions of up to 20 dB being demonstrated; levels can reduce further when multiple noise abatement systems are used. It is also noted that some systems are more effective at high frequencies, which would be beneficial to species of marine mammal, and some are more effective at lower frequencies, which would aid in noise reductions for fish. Some caution should be taken with the results: the frequency attenuation data presented are limited to 10 kHz, whereas there can be significant energy above this from pile strikes (for example), and the greatest sensitivity of many marine mammals of concern, including harbour porpoises, is also above this.

Subacoustech Environmental's modelling processes include the use of these forms of mitigation where appropriate.

Links:

http://www.smruconsulting.com/noise-abatement-system-report/

https://www.nature.scot/snh-research-report-1070-review-noise-abatement-systems-offshore-wind-farm-construction-noise-and

Report reference: Verfuss U K, Sinclair R R, Sparling C E (2019). A review of noise abatement systems for offshore wind farm construction noise, and the potential for their application in Scottish waters. Scottish Natural Heritage Research Report No. 1070.

Image: Hero Lang (Fotograf)Fa. Hydrotechnik Lübeck (Rechteinhaber) [CC BY-SA 3.0 de ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en) ]

Another Successful Monitoring Campaign Completed

by Sam East • 10 May 2021
Underwater noise study of P&A completed in the southern North Sea

Covid-19 Update

by Sam East • 30 March 2020
From all of us at Subacoustech Environmental, we hope everyone reading this, their friends and family are well. Following recent government guidelines, like many other companies, we have closed our offices. However, we are very well equipped to continue with most of our normal activities, including modelling, consultancy, data analysis and quotations. Please continue to get in touch with us by email, phone or our contact form and we will respond as quickly as possible. We wish you all the best for the next few weeks and months. Sam, Tim and the team at Subacoustech Environmental.

New marine mammal exposure criteria from Southall et al. (2019)

18 June 2019
March 2019 saw the publication of new marine mammal exposure criteria from Southall et al. The paper utilises research from the NMFS (2018) study that introduced the weightings and criteria that we and the underwater noise industry currently use. After thoroughly analysing the new report we found that the weightings and criteria presented in Southall’s paper are actually identical to those from NMFS, with a one minor difference; the naming of the marine mammal groupings. The four main groups that we used from the NMFS paper were low-frequency cetaceans (LF), mid-frequency cetaceans (MF), high-frequency cetaceans (HF), and phocid pinnipeds in water (PW). Southall keeps the same frequency responses but renames these same four groups, respectively, to be low-frequency cetaceans (LF), high-frequency cetaceans (HF), very high-frequency cetaceans (VHF) and phocid carnivores in water (PCW). All of Subacoustech’s upcoming modelling and reporting will utilise the new Southall naming convention for these criteria. References: • Southall B L, Finneran J J, Reichmuth C, Nachtigall P E, Ketten D R, Bowles A E, Ellison W T, Nowacek D P, Tyack P L (2019). Marine Mammal Noise Exposure Criteria: Updated Scientific Recommendations for Residual Hearing Effects. Aquatic Mammals 2019, 45(2), 125-232, DOI 10.1578/AM.45.2.2019.125. • National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (2018). 2018 Revisions to: Technical guidance for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammal Hearing (Version 2.0): Underwater Thresholds for Onset of Permanent and Temporary Threshold Shifts. U.S. Dept. of Commer., NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandu, NMFS-OPR-59. Link: https://www.aquaticmammalsjournal.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1886:mari...

New Offices

18 June 2019
On 10th June 2019, we moved into our new home in Southampton. For much of our history, Subacoustech Environmental has been based in rural Bishops Waltham which was an idyllic location in close proximity to excellent coffee shops was idyllic. However, we had limited space to grow and equipment storage was increasingly problematic. Our new home, close to the River Itchen in Southampton, is a former warehouse from the Victorian era that has been refurbished to provide modern offices space with ample storage for our bulky measurement equipment. Our new contact details and phone number can be found here